Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by jrflo on Thursday July 30, 2026 @02:40PM
(#49113922)
It's marketing hyperbole, but Luna is more intelligent per dollar than deepseek-v4 pro. Cost means nothing without the associated capability
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by efficax on Thursday July 30, 2026 @02:45PM
(#49114003)
is it? i don't know how we measure these things, but here's one measurement that says v4 pro is better than luna: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/gpt-5-6-lun...
presumably it's a much bigger model
Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by energy123 on Thursday July 30, 2026 @02:57PM
(#49114161)
This has already been updated with the new prices?
Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by pornel on Thursday July 30, 2026 @03:53PM
(#49114900)
The intelligence scores are absolute, not per $.
DeepSeek Pro is more capable than Luna regardless of the cost.
Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by energy123 on Friday July 31, 2026 @12:25AM
(#49118992)
There's also a cost graph on the same page and the context of this conversation is cost vs performance frontier.
Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by lemming on Thursday July 30, 2026 @11:41PM
(#49118744)
That’s comparing Luna on medium thinking with Deepseek on max. If you switch Luna to xhigh in that comparison it’s considerably more capable while still also cheaper.
Re:Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6
by jmolinski on Thursday July 30, 2026 @11:55PM
(#49118819)
You are comparing Luna medium to Deepseek Max, when you switch to Luna high it's cheaper per task than DS and has a better intelligence score, which goes higher yet on xhigh and max reasoning levels.
https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/gpt-5-6-lun...