Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery?

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by trollbridge on Thursday July 30, 2026 @10:25AM (#49110477)

One of the problems with gasoline is its explosive nature, which the fuel storage and delivery system of a car attempts to mitigate. It has a better profile for burning off than a battery though since it will spill out and burn away from the vehicle.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by not_the_fda on Thursday July 30, 2026 @12:37PM (#49112375)

Gasoline isn't that explosive. You can shoot up a gas tank and it will just burn. What you see on TV is movie magic. Gasoline vapor can explode, but you need the right air to fuel ratio and a spark.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by SV_BubbleTime on Thursday July 30, 2026 @01:38PM (#49113172)

Uh… gasoline has a super high vapor pressure. If you start out at the wrong ratio, it does what it can to make that ratio right.

I’ve seen a few gasoline fires that start by burning, and then much more rapidly expressing potential.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by capitainenemo on Thursday July 30, 2026 @02:16PM (#49113637)

Requires a good mix though. The parent is still correct. Mythbusters spent a long time trying to get cars to blow up in a dramatic hollywood fashion in various episodes and determined that under most conditions it wouldn't happen.

They did get it to happen, they just had to try really hard.

In most accidents the gas tank will not blow up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by vablings on Thursday July 30, 2026 @02:49PM (#49114046)

High velocity accidents where the gas is quickly dispersed into the air is pretty much the only way that happens.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by jojobas on Thursday July 30, 2026 @09:31PM (#49118036)

Even then it's just a slow-burning fireball, not detonation, no shockwave.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by vablings on Friday July 31, 2026 @05:57PM (#49129013)

Still more than enough to burn your windpipe, skin to 2/3rd degree and permanently disfigure you

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by jjk166 on Saturday August 01, 2026 @08:06PM (#49139830)

All of which are symptoms of burning, not explosion.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by capitainenemo on Wednesday August 05, 2026 @12:33PM (#49185184)

And was still not really possible without some really unlikely conditions. Not that car fires aren't dangerous, regardless of whether the vehicle is ICE or otherwise, but the fireball thing doesn't really happen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Is Everyone Trying to Build a Solid-State Battery? by leonidasrup on Thursday July 30, 2026 @01:59PM (#49113428)

"Fast X: why cars don’t really explode when they crash"

"Petrol and diesel can only explode when under pressure and mixed with air and in the case of petrol, have a small amount of energy added in the form of a spark or a flame. Engines pressurise the fuel/air mixture in the cylinder and so produce small, confined explosions which turn a crankshaft and drive the wheels."

"When cars are involved in collisions, fuel lines are often torn and petrol leaks out onto a hot engine. Liquid petrol can catch fire in the presence of air. But it can’t explode because it’s not under pressure and is in the liquid phase rather than a vapour."

https://theconversation.com/fast-x-why-cars-dont-really-expl...

[ Parent | on HN ]