News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Kuna: Decompiler Development in the Age of Coding Agents.

Re:Kuna: Decompiler Development in the Age of Coding Agents by comandillos on Thursday July 30, 2026 @09:07AM (#49109468)
Haven't used IDA much lately, but after looking at the screenshot with that IDA PRO decompiled code in their website I feel like Ghidra is already ahead of them in this area :D
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kuna: Decompiler Development in the Age of Coding Agents by Orphis on Thursday July 30, 2026 @12:34PM (#49112339)
I have seen some code where either Ghidra or IDA is producing the better output. It's not cut and dry, but in general, I do prefer Ghidra.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kuna: Decompiler Development in the Age of Coding Agents by mahaloz on Thursday July 30, 2026 @03:45PM (#49114808)
Interesting. A lot of data shows IDA Pro is significantly better than Ghidra: https://decbench.com/

Based on today's results, IDA Pro is ahead by 15 percentage points, which would mean, statistically, IDA Pro will recover perfect source code for 15% more functions than Ghidra on average.

[ Parent | on HN ]