Re:Europe's Ultra-Rich Could Fund a Substantial Part of the ...
by arjie on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @12:02PM
(#49085918)
The proposal does not involve reducing existing taxes. It is a technique to pay for increased spending. So the latter sentence seems unlikely.
Re:Europe's Ultra-Rich Could Fund a Substantial Part of the ...
by xienze on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @12:02PM
(#49085914)
> Maybe if they taxed NW >100 million, you wouldn’t need a 50% tax on work.
Don't be mistaken, it's an "in addition to" tax, not "instead of", or else it wouldn't be pitched as one of many ways to plug a budget hole.
Re:Europe's Ultra-Rich Could Fund a Substantial Part of the ...
by bigbadfeline on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @03:10PM
(#49101692)
Any "addition to tax" should still be a tax.
Maybe if they taxed NW >100 million, you wouldn’t need a 50% tax on work.