Our position on open-weights models

Re:Our position on open-weights models by tough on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @06:51AM (#49082008)

if you google "hf hack" the first result is OpenAI post-mortem official blog post so...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our position on open-weights models by witrak on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @07:25AM (#49082263)

Lol! Does it matter? Using an unclear acronym in the first reference to an object, besides adding energy waste (for the execution of unnecessary searches by users unfamiliar with the subject), may only give the author of the comment the thrill of "being well informed, an insider".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our position on open-weights models by bethekidyouwant on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @08:35AM (#49082884)

Wtf is a coca-cola?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our position on open-weights models by Barbing on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @11:03AM (#49085032)

Curse of knowledge. / Unsafe assumption.

Some users feel IP address, ISP, and LLM are clear. Fewer of those users will also reference HF. I have had to stop myself and type out Hugging Face.

HR perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

[ Parent | on HN ]