News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goodbye, Uploads by jeremymcanally on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @08:28PM (#4908097)
By the way, downloads of source aren't going away (i.e., get a zip or tar ball)! Just the "upload anything and make it available" feature. There seems to be a little confusion about that.
Re:Goodbye, Uploads by snogglethorpe on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @08:58PM (#4908192)
No, most people commenting here seem to perfectly well understand what's going away. An auto-generated repo-contents tarball isn't the same thing as a proper source-distribution tarball.
Re:Goodbye, Uploads by wooster on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @08:43PM (#4908141)
There's no misunderstanding here. You're removing a feature which a lot of us use and pay for. This sucks.
Re:Goodbye, Uploads by res0nat0r on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @11:12PM (#4908596)
GitHub is for source code hosting. Not tens to hundreds of MB binary hosting. Put your binaries in s3 and link to them from your project if needed.

They probably determined the excess bloat and strain on their infrastructure from git cloning huge binaries outweighed the benefits so they are removing the feature.

Re:Goodbye, Uploads by darkarmani on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @11:53PM (#4908699)
If that is all it is for I might as well host my own git repos too.
Re:Goodbye, Uploads by wooster on Wednesday December 12, 2012 @12:15AM (#4908757)
The downloads aren't stored in git. They're stored on Amazon S3. Every download link redirects to cloud.github.com, which is fronted by Amazon CloudFront.

Which, conveniently enough, is exactly what they want us to do ourselves now. I already pay GitHub to do that for me, how is it a benefit for me, the paying customer, to do that myself by hand?

Re:Goodbye, Uploads by res0nat0r on Wednesday December 12, 2012 @12:27AM (#4908797)
Ah my fault then I misunderstood the blog post. Sounds like they are just removing it to alleviate confusion only then as the blog post states.