News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by nujabe on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:22PM (#49078897)
This is such a poor quality post, reads more like a diary entry than a substantive technical post.
Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by PontifexCipher on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:28PM (#49078936)
Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by nujabe on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:44PM (#49079068)
??

Edit: I see, had typo last word of sentence was meant to be “blog”

Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by PontifexCipher on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @12:24AM (#49079333)
No, my point is that it's a post on a personal blog not a peer reviewed paper.
Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by kelnos on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @03:39AM (#49080623)
As in, the post is a blog, which is often literally someone's diary.

Also, if you don't like a submission, flag it and move on. Commenting that you don't like it doesn't add anything to the discussion.

Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by sroerick on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:43PM (#49079065)
lol
Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by aprilnya on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @12:07AM (#49079223)
I think that's what it's meant to be...
Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by Gigachad on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:41PM (#49079050)
I will take 5000 "diary entry" blog posts over LLM generated walls of text that say nothing.

People need to learn to just post the prompt rather than the LLM output which just fluffs the prompt.

Re:Using an open model feels surprisingly good by Ancapistani on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @03:01PM (#49088389)
I've not blogged since the rise of AI started in earnest, but I intend to do just that: the prompt I used in a collapsed callout at the top, and the actual post body below. Yes, I'll do a ton of editing, but the prompt itself is close enough to a summary to be useful, and if someone is in a hurry it'll be the fastest way to get the gist.