It's a security theater but you should at least respect that the guy was willing to die for beautifully designed devices and rid us of Adobe Flash.
Re:Android May Soon Restrict On-Device ADB
by hnlmorg on Saturday July 25, 2026 @04:18PM
(#49051127)
> you should at least respect that the guy was willing to die for beautifully designed devices
I don’t think that kind of stupidity warrants respect.
Re:Android May Soon Restrict On-Device ADB
by Cider9986 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @06:01PM
(#49052058)
Hard disagree. iPhones are some of the most secure devices available. They are much more secure than desktop computers. This is a good thing because it protects users private data. With how much personal data phones, it seems reasonable to secure them extensively.
That's why I use GrapheneOS.
Re:Android May Soon Restrict On-Device ADB
by bluebarbet on Saturday July 25, 2026 @06:32PM
(#49052389)
>iPhones are some of the most secure devices available
How do you know? We're not allowed to see the source code.
Re:Android May Soon Restrict On-Device ADB
by nolist_policy on Sunday July 26, 2026 @04:47AM
(#49056035)
Replace iPhone with Android/GrapheneOS and the argument still holds.
In early days of this, I honestly think it was rooted in the famous Steve Jobs paranoia, the one that shipped without an app store and told users to use Safari, the same Steve Jobs that was said to not want certain medical devices during cancer treatment to touch him because they weren't beautifully designed. It was fundamentally about not wanting "dirty" things coming in contact with his "perfect" device. They dressed it up in language about security as a post hoc justification.
I remember in those days people would say they didn't want it to be like malware ridden Windows 98. But they omitted the weak security behind Windows at that time, which modern systems had long ago exceeded, even in the Windows world.