Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by trouve_search on Friday July 24, 2026 @04:25PM
(#49041170)
From my reading, the sandbox escape came from the JS packages in the harness still having an internet connection (somehow!), the agent having access to the source of those packages, reading it and executing code from them to access the internet.
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by modeless on Friday July 24, 2026 @05:54PM
(#49042074)
From what I read the actual escape was through a proxy that allows downloading Python packages from the internet. It's not supposed to allow general internet access but the AI found a previously unknown vulnerability in it. That is hardly "standard and well documented script kiddie methods", nor does it seem like criminally negligent sandbox design, though clearly they will need to reduce their attack surface in the future. I hope they are working on a physical air gap and faraday cage because it seems like it won't be long before it is legitimately required.
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by Spooky23 on Friday July 24, 2026 @04:37PM
(#49041279)
Ah, yes. The airgapped lab with internet access.
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by grim_io on Friday July 24, 2026 @05:15PM
(#49041666)
Luckily, no real intelligence will emerge from all this. Otherwise we'd be fucked.
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by simonw on Friday July 24, 2026 @06:22PM
(#49042344)
They never claimed to be airgapped. That's a term people keep on throwing around in spite of that.
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by Spooky23 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @01:28AM
(#49044780)
Worse, they’re running tests that are hacking third party computers with no controls other than “guardrails”.
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by plw1286 on Friday July 24, 2026 @04:44PM
(#49041354)
Alternative theories, since OpenAI does not release proper information:
The cache proxy was from Astral (acquired by OpenAI) and the model was used for coding it, so it knew the code base and exploit already!
Or it was squid with dozens of known exploits ...
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by arbirk on Friday July 24, 2026 @05:50PM
(#49042032)
That is not really how LLMs work
Re:Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story
by simonreiff on Friday July 24, 2026 @08:21PM
(#49043245)
Squid is my working guess as well
> AI broke in using standard script kiddie methods.
I've spent time gathering the detail of what happen here and while there are some solid theories and indicators, absolutely nothing so far has suggested a sandbox escape using "well documented script kiddie methods" or that the method used to break into the HF network was similar. Where did you get this from?