Re:I Think You Might Be Fooling Yourself with AI
by eudamoniac on Thursday July 23, 2026 @12:45PM
(#49024576)
>pump out stable features
>data corruption...urgent fix required
Do you people hear yourselves?
Re:I Think You Might Be Fooling Yourself with AI
by solumunus on Thursday July 23, 2026 @01:11PM
(#49024955)
Are you claiming you’ve never been responsible for a bug that caused data corruption? Perhaps not, but it’s hardly a novel post-LLM bug. It’s regular stuff and obviously you know that.
Re:I Think You Might Be Fooling Yourself with AI
by eudamoniac on Thursday July 23, 2026 @01:25PM
(#49025180)
As a 2 man developer team working on a mono repo with clear and simple architecture, no I have never caused urgent data corruption or seen it happen. That is more something that happens in codebases that are too big and complex to fully grasp. That it has already happened to you in this scenario does not bode well for the future stability of your codebase, in my opinion.
Re:I Think You Might Be Fooling Yourself with AI
by solumunus on Thursday July 23, 2026 @02:43PM
(#49026257)
Urgent is an exaggeration I suppose. I have a high standard of customer service so to me it’s urgent, but the data was corrupted for 3 months before anyone noticed so it wasn’t critical.
Ok I guess we just suck, whatever. We and our customers are very happy.
Just the other day there was data corruption discovered and a relatively urgent fix required. Just a few years ago I would have been working deep into the night to make sure everything was fixed for the morning. Within an hour Fable had it all wrapped up neatly and the fix deployed…