News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An office with "library rules" by lnanek2 on Monday December 10, 2012 @04:20PM (#4901565)
I code around 16 hours a day and only have to do one call a day. I'd love a library office. Hell, sometimes I have to take my laptop outside to get some big commit done that will take 6 hours of concentration or so, if my various headphones can't block out the constant talking.
Re:An office with "library rules" by bconway on Monday December 10, 2012 @11:12PM (#4902981)
I code around 16 hours a day

You're doing it wrong.

Re:An office with "library rules" by iamdave on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @12:32AM (#4903183)
How?
Re:An office with "library rules" by Cthulhu_ on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @05:43AM (#4903990)
More hours does not equal higher productivity. Working for six hours on a single commit (as the poster indicates) means the commit is far, far too large. Unless he means 'feature', then it's okay.
Re:An office with "library rules" by kyberias on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @08:06AM (#4904354)
I don't see how you can make that deduction. You must be some kind of commit-nazi. Working hours do not correlate with the size of the commit. There might have been a number of hours just thinking about the implementation, designing the solution, fix, whatever, before writing a single line. The actual commit can then be e.g. 10 lines of code. There are many, many reasons why a single commit can take several hours of work. And it's perfectly fine and normal. Don't be judgmental like that.