News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by sscaryterry on Sunday July 19, 2026 @06:25PM (#48972221)
If only paying the $168k was some sort of a guarantee. Vibing doesn't give you that.

You might get more maintainable code for $168k by hiring humans, but if its something bespoke it isn't going to get you far (or far quickly).

Vibing is straight out gambling right now, the thing is, I don't know who the house is any more.

Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by nomel on Sunday July 19, 2026 @07:31PM (#48972681)
It's going to take an order of magnitude longer though, delaying any of that revenue significantly. I'm sorry, but we're talking 11 days here. What does "maintainable" even mean with impossible time-scales like this now!?
Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by sscaryterry on Sunday July 19, 2026 @08:14PM (#48972952)
The new normal is there is no normal. No common sense, FOMO, YOLO, everything combined is what we're living right now :)
Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by nkrisc on Sunday July 19, 2026 @08:27PM (#48973038)
Perpetual complete rewrites. When there’s more bugs the LLM can fix, rewrite the whole codebase. Repeat ad infinitum.
Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by pdimitar on Sunday July 19, 2026 @08:56PM (#48973228)
True on the premise, remains to be seen if that's what's going to happen in practice.

In my work I have Fable/Opus add bespoke linters and tie them to verify/precommit tasks (including in CI) so nothing of the reworks and 15+ initiatives we have in flight ever regresses.

Some discipline will remove that worry of yours. It's not nice to immediately assume that the rewrite's orchestrator (Jarred) did not use discipline. He even outlined a few false starts.

Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by throwaway7783 on Sunday July 19, 2026 @08:36PM (#48973100)
.. by hiring the right humans - which is not always a given
Re:Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now by pdimitar on Sunday July 19, 2026 @09:04PM (#48973296)
Even worse: it's much safer to assume you'll hire the wrong humans, most of the time.