I suppose it is appropriate that this riddle appears twice on the page. =)
Re:Banach-Tarski paradox
by ColinWright on Sunday December 09, 2012 @05:24PM
(#4896421)
norvig's comment didn't exist when I started mine, but by the time I'd typed all my comment in, norvig's had appeared. I toyed with the idea of deleting the riddle from mine, but have decided to leave it.
"What's an anagram of Banach-Tarski?"
A: "Banch-Tarski Banach-Tarski"