Re:42% of adults rely on their parents for financial support
by annjose on Thursday July 16, 2026 @02:37PM
(#48938417)
I agree with you - there’s usually some adjustment for sampling bias, and this study says it is matching Census targets. But I had to go three levels down to see that info before I derive any meaning from the number.
My concern is that headlines like “x% of adults do y” get repeated without anyone (sometimes even journalists writing the article) seeing the methodology or nuance behind them. Context matters.
Re:42% of adults rely on their parents for financial support
by dclowd9901 on Thursday July 16, 2026 @02:54PM
(#48938667)
Still, it lowers the resolution of the results if you have to throw out a significant portion of the interviews.
Re:42% of adults rely on their parents for financial support
by vel0city on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:00PM
(#48938763)
You're not just throwing them out though, those responses do have input. Their input is just weighted.
https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2018/01/26/how-different...
The impulse to ask "what population was sampled?" is good but its not always a straight line from there to "these results directly reflect that sampling bias."
In fact, from the page you posted: "Data for the general U.S. population (including the High Net Worth oversample) were weighted to Census targets for education, age, gender, race/ethnicity, region and household income. A full methodology is available."
I would presume that the headline number attempts to account for sampling bias.