Re:The Folly of Scientism
by thirdtruck on Saturday December 08, 2012 @10:23PM
(#4893654)
Exactly, rohern. Just look at the findings on oxytocin.
Even more to the point: the impetus lies with the proponents of "love as a useful, concrete object" to defend their hypothesis from dissection by neuroscientists. Linguistic and poetic convention have no hold over hard data.
Even more to the point: the impetus lies with the proponents of "love as a useful, concrete object" to defend their hypothesis from dissection by neuroscientists. Linguistic and poetic convention have no hold over hard data.