Re:The Folly of Scientism
by AffableSpatula on Saturday December 08, 2012 @06:57PM
(#4893189)
That begs the question: if you weren't sure what was meant by the terms, why did you assert that they were "all part of science"?
Neurology has a lot of information about where consciousness comes from. It's not complete, but nothing we know is.
> experience, spontaneity
More neurology, from what I can tell that these words mean. However, they're vague, and can be defined in so many ways that I don't know precisely what you mean.
> 'the present moment'
This is amazingly vague. It could be related to time, to consciousness, or to who-knows-what.