Do you really have nothing to offer about how intuition is useful or legitimate as a "way of knowing"? You want to just say the word "intuition" and have us respond, "huh, interesting"? Talk about intellectually engaging.
You just wrote
> Your inability to fit it into your belief system is not my problem.
and
> I'm not trying to convince you.
And now you are complaining that people fail to engage with you meaningfully. You are drowning in a pool you filled yourself.
Re:The Folly of Scientism
by socialist_coder on Saturday December 08, 2012 @06:28PM
(#4893100)
People who believe in science don't want to argue with someone who believes in something based on faith? Huh, interesting.
Really, I'm not certain you would be convinced even if I did a better job, though. All I'm really looking for is less of a skeptical "explain it to me in terms of science" viewpoint, and more of a "huh, interesting" response. I've never seen someone even try to work with me when discussing these things. It's always shut down so they can claim their Internet points.
Not intellectually engaging in the slightest.