Re:The Folly of Scientism
by shasta on Saturday December 08, 2012 @05:37PM
(#4892942)
This is exactly it. Hughes writes:
> Similarly, modern theorists imply, the multiverse has necessary being even though any given universe does not.
No. What's implicit is that arguments of necessary being will not ever be found.
As I'm fond of saying (a bit unfairly): a philosopher is someone insightful enough to ask the fundamental questions and thick enough to try to answer them.
> Similarly, modern theorists imply, the multiverse has necessary being even though any given universe does not.
No. What's implicit is that arguments of necessary being will not ever be found.
As I'm fond of saying (a bit unfairly): a philosopher is someone insightful enough to ask the fundamental questions and thick enough to try to answer them.