News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by drcongo on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @12:12PM (#48909030)
Having now given it a quick spin, I like the UI concept and could definitely see myself working with this. I ran into a bug(?) almost immediately though, I hooked up Deepseek 4 Pro, gave it a small task and got this

``` LLM error: POST "https://api.deepseek.com/v1/chat/completions": 400 Bad Request {"message":"The `reasoning_content` in the thinking mode must be passed back to the API.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_request_error"} ```

I'm unsure about putting my Anthropic key in there as I've lost track of what they ban you for or whether that eats money from outside of my subscription.

Oooh, and nicer support for codefences would be good.

Re: by julesrms on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @12:15PM (#48909092)
Ta for the heads-up, these provider API things are super easy to fix, but hard to keep on top of them changing under our feet!
Re: by drcongo on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @12:25PM (#48909271)
No problem. A tiny bit more working with it and I think I'm sold, it fits my mental model really nicely, thanks!
Re: by julesrms on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @12:45PM (#48909566)
Awesome to hear it. I built something that fitted my own mental model, and am assuming others out there have a similar one!