News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM... by killerstorm on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:04AM (#48893831)
Privilege escalation (e.g. setuid), world-readable files might contain sensitive data, world-writeable files, unrestricted network access (including access to all locally running services)... If you have fully patched system without zero-days and it's configured in a perfect way, then, sure...

Container is quite like a "separate user" except you can explicitly define what it can access.

(Even if all your daemons have good auth, it's now quite common for _apps_ to open listening sockets without much auth...)

Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM... by wilkystyle on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:06AM (#48893866)
Also, many of these sandboxing solutions provide features like network allowlists and credential masking/injection
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM... by vqtska on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:07AM (#48893880)
Sure, if you assume the agent will be hostile on you. I thought it's just so the agent doesn't accidentally rm -rf / on you
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM... by killerstorm on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:11AM (#48893930)
The agent might install hostile software, e.g. a npm package. Unfortunately, very common problem nowadays.
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM... by pigeons on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:10AM (#48893919)
They do try privilege escalation unprompted.
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM... by Retr0id on Monday July 13, 2026 @12:26PM (#48895024)
There are documented instances of LLMs casually using LPEs in order to achieve an objective: https://xcancel.com/sluongng/status/2060746160558543217

And that's without anything like prompt injection happening.