Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM...
by wilkystyle on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:06AM
(#48893866)
Also, many of these sandboxing solutions provide features like network allowlists and credential masking/injection
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM...
by vqtska on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:07AM
(#48893880)
Sure, if you assume the agent will be hostile on you. I thought it's just so the agent doesn't accidentally rm -rf / on you
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM...
by killerstorm on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:11AM
(#48893930)
The agent might install hostile software, e.g. a npm package. Unfortunately, very common problem nowadays.
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM...
by pigeons on Monday July 13, 2026 @11:10AM
(#48893919)
They do try privilege escalation unprompted.
Re:Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM...
by Retr0id on Monday July 13, 2026 @12:26PM
(#48895024)
There are documented instances of LLMs casually using LPEs in order to achieve an objective: https://xcancel.com/sluongng/status/2060746160558543217
And that's without anything like prompt injection happening.
Container is quite like a "separate user" except you can explicitly define what it can access.
(Even if all your daemons have good auth, it's now quite common for _apps_ to open listening sockets without much auth...)