Re:Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade...
by nerdsniper on Sunday July 12, 2026 @03:35AM
(#48879162)
Indeed, it appears I was miseducated to believe there was more of a consensus that "free market" assumes approximately "perfect competition", when in reality there is a less of a consensus than I was taught -- e.g. modern followers/revivalists of "Austrian economics" are quite opposed to the idea of perfect competition being a condition of a free market.
Re:Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade...
by capr on Sunday July 12, 2026 @05:16AM
(#48879613)
Yup, because perfect competition is fundamentally the same as the salary cap, except for companies instead of employees. Specialization leads to natural monopolies at company level just as it does at personal level. Besides, the term monopoly only makes sense when it's state-enforced. In a free market it loses meaning since every company has a monopoly on their exact product.
"A free market is an economic system where prices, production, and distribution of goods and services are determined purely by the laws of supply and demand, rather than by government intervention. In an idealized free market, buyers and sellers voluntarily exchange goods, and competition naturally drives innovation, efficiency, and fair pricing."
That's what I'm talking about.
The wikipedia Perfect_competition reference does not mention "free market".
Google says Adam Smith never mentioned the term "perfect competition".