Re:Einstein's relativity rules chemical bonds in heavy eleme...
by Jblx2 on Saturday July 11, 2026 @04:34PM
(#48875573)
Electrons in an antenna aren't transitioning between quantum states and are still radiating.
Re:Einstein's relativity rules chemical bonds in heavy eleme...
by DHRicoF on Saturday July 11, 2026 @05:08PM
(#48875900)
Yes they are. They are transitioning through levels in the conduction band where you have plenty of them.
Every time you see a macroscopic phenomena, you are looking at a stupidly high amount of quantum levels with very similar energies.
Re:Einstein's relativity rules chemical bonds in heavy eleme...
by CamperBob2 on Saturday July 11, 2026 @04:45PM
(#48875684)
That's a good point, I don't know what's up with that. Google just says, "A single oscillating electron does not continuously emit radio waves; it has a microscopic probability of emitting a single RF photon during a given cycle." It would be necessary to delve into the whole QED thing to get a better explanation, based on what I'm reading.
Either way, quarks don't have an electron-like magnetic moment, so they aren't capable of coupling to the EM field.
Similar to why the electron in a hydrogen atom doesn't keep emitting radiation and crash into the nucleus once it reaches its ground state... there's no lower state for it to jump to.