Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by isatty on Friday July 10, 2026 @04:25PM
(#48864785)
A football field is by far a better measurement than 3300 one pound bags of sugar.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by sph on Friday July 10, 2026 @05:24PM
(#48865488)
It is not if all you know are football fields and not American football fields.
I still don’t know how they even compare.
Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by bch on Friday July 10, 2026 @05:32PM
(#48865588)
That's why we use the %fill of an Olympic Sized Pool - doesn't matter from what continent the field comes, they fill the pool equally.
Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by necovek on Friday July 10, 2026 @11:54PM
(#48868573)
Aren't there significant differences in allowed depth (from minimum of 2m to maximum of 3m)?
Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by bch on Saturday July 11, 2026 @12:37AM
(#48868799)
Good catch. We've run into a problem somewhere along this journey of comparing the compression strength of a snails tooth to the tensile strength of a spiders web.
Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by necovek on Saturday July 11, 2026 @02:09AM
(#48869242)
So a snail's tooth can only hold a 2m deep worth of Olympic pool (sea)water, but it breaks before you get to a 3m deep pool.
Re:Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest mat...
by throw1234567891 on Saturday July 11, 2026 @05:08PM
(#48875902)
Only if you don’t understand that 3300 one pound bags of sugar is 3300 pounds. What an enlightening conversation here. Crème de la crème of modern thinkers.