Re:Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postg...
by LtWorf on Thursday July 09, 2026 @06:24PM
(#48853179)
Remember when databases were faster to run in virtualbox rather than bare metal? (because virtual box was completely ignoring all the instructions to flush the data on the disks)
Re:Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postg...
by codys on Thursday July 09, 2026 @09:14PM
(#48854603)
It'd be very unfortunate if Postgres didn't have regression tests for data loss due to bad io patterns. Should be possible to do some checks against those in an appropriate test harness. Which might mean "have qemu run something we can kill off and examine the results".
If those don't exist, I hope folks recognize how useful they are and add them.
Re:Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postg...
by f311a on Friday July 10, 2026 @01:29AM
(#48856055)
Yeah, claims that it can be faster than CH are very suspicious. CH guys are very good at their craft, they spend hundreds of hours optimizing one single small detail.
Re:Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postg...
by diarrhea on Friday July 10, 2026 @03:38AM
(#48856895)
Yeah. I don't think PG could even come close. Column-oriented is fundamentally different, and pairs well with all the SIMD acceleration ClickHouse is also doing. There's just no comparison. If a Postgres rewrite came close to that, it must've sacrificed something else.
Just checking, is fsync on? :) Regression tests don't catch bad IO patterns afaik.
Anyway... sounds like a fun project to work on!