News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-5.6 by adastra22 on Thursday July 09, 2026 @02:56PM (#48850751)
I have not noticed this with Opus 4.6+. The result is usually not too far from what I would have written myself.
Re:GPT-5.6 by epolanski on Thursday July 09, 2026 @05:58PM (#48852914)
Opus 4.6 was the best model in the family, following two ones were seriously brain damaged to do well on benchmarks.
Re:GPT-5.6 by techflowz on Thursday July 09, 2026 @07:22PM (#48853754)
yeah those have been horrible
Re:GPT-5.6 by epolanski on Friday July 10, 2026 @04:17AM (#48857209)
I wouldn't say terrible-terrible but only better at from-prompt-to-solution rather than interactive discussing and problem solving.

I tend to define it "better at solving, worse at assisting phenomenon". Which doesn't properly show on benchmarks that only focus on the solving part.