GPT-5.6 - Hackdot

Re:GPT-5.6 by 217 on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:17PM (#48849294)

Consensus itself does NOT matter, omp is objectively the best harness for power users yet it has 0 hn posts about it, zero.

You're fully free to use and try anything and without caring about what others think is right

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by trollbridge on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:28PM (#48849475)

omp is really good.

I have one non technical people in my firm using it. One is using it to assist with editing books, basically using it to gather up manuscripts from e-mail / Google Doc etc. submissions, and then switch models between a cheap one and Opus (for actually analysing the manuscript).

The other non-technical person has done really surprising things with it AI, like a long-running GPT 5.5 Pro chat session which is basically her expense tracker - it has an .xlsx file "carried" in the chat, and she just tells ChatGPT (or scans a receipt) whenever she has a new expense, and then prompts it in natural language when she needs a report. I'm looking forward to seeing what she can do with omp.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by ljm on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:58PM (#48849976)

I figured pi itself would be the best harness because it's barebones and you make it what you want. omp is to pi what doom is to emacs is what lazyvim is to neovim.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by Avicebron on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:49PM (#48849843)

The fact that I thought that this was amp misspelled until i someone validate omp and the checked myself indicates it's a subjective assertion at best.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by saberience on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:39PM (#48849662)

How can this be "objective"? Surely its subjective.

I've tried a fuck load of harnesses but keep coming back to Codex as my harness.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by financltravsty on Thursday July 09, 2026 @02:06PM (#48850091)

Absolutely. It's the only harness that is actually RSI and not run by idiots.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by joe_mamba on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:31PM (#48849531)

> omp is objectively the best harness for power users

Care to detail this?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by efficax on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:27PM (#48849464)

"objectively the best"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by incognito124 on Thursday July 09, 2026 @03:44PM (#48851426)

To quote a friend:

> Well it's objective _to me_

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by saberience on Thursday July 09, 2026 @01:39PM (#48849668)

Probably means subjectively according to his own opinion...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by rpdillon on Thursday July 09, 2026 @05:30PM (#48852617)

omp is amazing. Daily driver for me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by NamlchakKhandro on Thursday July 09, 2026 @06:28PM (#48853221)

Because it's a bunch of extension on top of on pi

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by maest on Thursday July 09, 2026 @06:44PM (#48853411)

omp.sh is unreadable. I've tried understanding what exactly this is and it's just a wall of edgy sounding slop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5.6 by ncr501212 on Friday July 10, 2026 @09:58AM (#48860026)

OMP feels like the Linux of AI

[ Parent | on HN ]