Re:A new log4j 2.0
by SCdF on Thursday December 06, 2012 @03:41PM
(#4883676)
Exactly, their "solution" doesn't actually solve the problem people had. Also, {}? Why not:
If they wanted to have format capabilities in the logger, why didn't they just use pre-existing standards?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.