l: A new runtime for k and q

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by jloveless on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @06:31PM (#48824912)

Unfortunately the code itself is in a style of C many find difficult to read. I blame my upbringing. ATW open sourced examples and it was not really helpful. More recently others are doing a step by step in more standard C https://github.com/ardentsia-cgs/kparser/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by hatefulmoron on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @03:42AM (#48828816)

Isn't that "more standard C" because it's written by Claude?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by AUnterrainer on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @04:53AM (#48829377)

Arthur Whitney's C is everything but standard

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by hatefulmoron on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @08:13AM (#48830912)

Not sure how you're replying to me without looking at the link.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by pillmillipedes on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @05:21AM (#48829599)

talking about the linked parser which is clearly claude's not arthur's

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by jazza68 on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @05:34AM (#48829730)

this page/site seems fascinated with Claude, to the point where it is an unnecessary distraction.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:l: A new runtime for k and q by veqq on Tuesday July 21, 2026 @04:15PM (#48997607)

Many of us can read atw C and would love to investigate!

[ Parent | on HN ]