Re:Road to Elm 1.0
by epolanski on Monday July 06, 2026 @03:43PM
(#48809541)
I'm one of those. I extended the language to support a bunch of niceties (essentially supporting a proper error channel and dependency injection through erasable sum types).
Elm is a nice language, but Ewan has no interest in building anything truly useful and the whole administration of the language is s disaster.
Elm is a nice language, but Ewan has no interest in building anything truly useful and the whole administration of the language is s disaster.