Re:Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (...
by kennywinker on Monday July 06, 2026 @02:23AM
(#48801258)
Nowhere in the GPL does it say how you can USE the software - you are free to run, modify, and use it any way you see fit. All its restrictions are triggered by DISTRIBUTION of the software, especially modified versions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (...
by bornfreddy on Monday July 06, 2026 @12:52PM
(#48807293)
The big gotcha is what one understands under the word "use". If I want to USE it as a basis for my business where I sell routers with the GPL software, there are some tiny restrictions regarding that, as Linksys learned [0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenWrt (see History section)
Re:Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (...
by rbanffy on Monday July 06, 2026 @03:25PM
(#48809318)
That’s correct. You can’t take freedoms away from your downstream users. As I said before, violating a free software license usually means you are stealing from your users, negating them rights they ought to be given.
Re:Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (...
by NeutralCrane on Monday July 06, 2026 @05:30PM
(#48810754)
Distribution is a subset of use
Re:Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (...
by kennywinker on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @01:54AM
(#48814102)
That’s one semantic interpretation of “use”, but not the only or the obvious one.
For most physical objects and concepts, distribution isn’t a subset of use. e.g. the post office. You can be a user, but you have no ability to distribute the post office - because that’s not a thing that is possible or makes sense. In that case distribution is not a subset of use. Other examples: most saas, e.g. gmail. Good luck distributing gmail.