Pet projects are getting too big to pet

Re:Pet projects are getting too big to pet by nnehdi on Friday July 03, 2026 @05:24PM (#48780173)

You are right! Not everyone is using AI for coding. I see your point.

But I also disagree with your claim saying agentic coding is nay less of care or less engineering.

I have 13 years of industry experience and was doing hand coding with vim. But I adapted agentic coding which I believe is very empowering

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pet projects are getting too big to pet by snovv_crash on Friday July 03, 2026 @05:36PM (#48780300)

Your comment is as empty as the prose from am LLM. I worry about the level of discourse LLMs train us to accept as normal. Assuming, of course, that this is even human-written.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pet projects are getting too big to pet by nnehdi on Saturday July 04, 2026 @05:15AM (#48783986)

You see, I am jut not afraid of LLLs, or I can cope with my fear. They are just piece of technologies:)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pet projects are getting too big to pet by snovv_crash on Saturday July 04, 2026 @02:30PM (#48787618)

Yes, they are just technology. And just like we shouldn't try to roll down the road like the wheel of a car, we shouldn't try to talk like LLMs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pet projects are getting too big to pet by inigyou on Saturday July 04, 2026 @05:33AM (#48784090)

This comment amounts to "you said agentic coding is less engineering, but I think you're wrong"

But somehow it takes five times as many words to say that. It doesn't feel AI-written, but could this be an effect of habitual AI use, that it trains a person to write extra words to disguise what they are saying?

[ Parent | on HN ]