Re:AI can't be listed as inventor on patent applications, Ja...
by dmoy on Thursday July 02, 2026 @04:16PM
(#48766793)
> because you risk losing priority to someone else.
Historically not so much in the US, but yes now that the US has joined the rest of the world with a first-to-file system
Assuming "MANY years ago" is >15, then the US was still in a first-to-invent system
Re:AI can't be listed as inventor on patent applications, Ja...
by dleeftink on Friday July 03, 2026 @01:11PM
(#48777340)
> it cannot have any ownership rights
Actor network theory sheds a tear. And more promptly: ownership rights are enacted via tools. Whether agentful or non-agentic, listing them would in the very least be similar to disclosing funding bodies or agencies.
But then it takes a decade or so to develop towards approval. You work together with outside researchers who lend their credibility and get attractive publication possibilities in return. Those publications also help to raise awareness with doctors and investors. Since some company researchers are also authors, this does indeed work as an incentive and is helpful for recruitment and ultimately more successful products.
To the core of the article: why would anyone want to file a patent with AI as a (co-)inventor? It's a tool, and it cannot have any ownership rights. And even if it did, it would diminish your share of royalties.