Show HN: QUALITY.md – open format/specification, agent skill, and CLI

Re:Show HN: QUALITY.md – open format/specification, agent sk... by hiAndrewQuinn on Thursday July 02, 2026 @01:51PM (#48765029)

I'm less interested in this than in what people are willing to aggressively trade off against in order to get the stuff they truly care about.

For example, readability. Where are the developers out there saying "I am very willing to sacrifice a lot of readability to get even a small improvement on e.g. abstraction cleanliness", and sticking with it?

Or "performance can take a huge hit at the cost of being dead easy to read and reason about". Coming up with a list of abstractly good-sounding qualities is just prosocial signaling without knowing what you're willing to sacrifice. There should be a FUCKIT.md that enumerates these.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: QUALITY.md – open format/specification, agent sk... by craigsmitham on Thursday July 02, 2026 @02:20PM (#48765413)

OP here. You're spot on. Trade-offs matter. The trade-offs are implied by the selection of what quality factors/attributes are selected and their requirements. A statement like "performance can take a huge hit at the cost of being dead easy to read and reason about" can sit right there in the QUALITY.md as a comment or in the markdown body.

[ Parent | on HN ]