News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Z-Jail – A 130 KB Linux sandbox-C99 with 7 defen... by Kaxo on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @03:54PM (#48752241)
The seccomp-BPF rules seem almost unusably strict. What is this even designed to be used to run?
Re:Show HN: Z-Jail – A 130 KB Linux sandbox-C99 with 7 defen... by gwerbin on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @04:02PM (#48752367)
It says on their Github profile that they are building some kind of nowhere detection product. Maybe in that context, a very strict syscall allowlist is useful or good?

> It is designed for CI pipelines, CTF jail challenges, and lightweight code evaluation

Looking at the list, it seems pretty good for that. What does a CI runner that just needs to run GCC or whatever really need?

Edit: no open does seem restrictive. Not that it's bad security (not my area of expertise), but how many useful programs use open that are just off limits here?

Re:Show HN: Z-Jail – A 130 KB Linux sandbox-C99 with 7 defen... by iririririr on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @04:40PM (#48752811)
allowing individual syscall is the sandbox standard today on BSDs and optin on linux. project have some issues but being too restrictive is not one