Re:Godot will no longer accept AI-authored code contributions
by ianm218 on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @09:18AM
(#48746267)
I think this is a false dichotomy. We’re getting lots of new productive output in some areas and in other areas it is too much slop.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Godot will no longer accept AI-authored code contributions
by terminalbraid on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @09:28AM
(#48746425)
Your argument might carry some weight if you added any kind of argument past "lots of new productive output" and then silence.
Re:Godot will no longer accept AI-authored code contributions
by ianm218 on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @09:48AM
(#48746745)
I feel like the topic has been discussed ad nausiem but:
* Software security - I.e. Mozilla blog post on using Mythos for software security [1]
* Algorithms - AlphaEvolve makes real progress on matrix multiplication [2]
* Open source - Backlog crushing in openvpn [3]
* Corporate - CloudFlare Oauth workers [4]
People are clearly using AI to ship real work that people end up using directly or indirectly. Projects like Godot are also in a weird spot though.
[1]. https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/ai-security-zer...
[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13131
[3] https://stanislas.blog/2025/12/claude-code-opus-open-source-...