Dismissing something because you think it’s AI is just a shortcut for not having to evaluate it. If the argument’s weak, say why — guessing the author isn’t analysis.

There is no obligation for others to evaluate the claims. The line quoted by the parent suggests that it was written by a mathematical crank. I doubt AI would make such an unecessary statement. This is not how serious mathematicians write.

I can't wait to read more about the Big Daddy Engine

> Capabilities of the Big Daddy Engine include: forcing spacetime to emerge generating matter from contradictions deriving constants of nature

Repeating the capabilities like a punchline only works if you can explain why they’re wrong. Otherwise you’re just reading aloud