News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Incident CVE-2026-LGTM. Parent comment

Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by dbliss on Friday June 26, 2026 @10:49AM (#48687318)
Great satire. The comedy of errors along the way made me realize that this could have happened also with humans instead of bots. But now it’s faster.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by unknownfuture on Friday June 26, 2026 @11:27AM (#48687807)
It... really couldn't? Step 3 in this fictional chain would never happen with a HITL.

I honestly can't tell with comments like this whether folks have too much respect for AI, or to little respect for people...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by falcor84 on Friday June 26, 2026 @12:52PM (#48688869)
What's "step 3"? I don't see step numbering anywhere?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by unknownfuture on Friday June 26, 2026 @01:13PM (#48689110)
Is... this comment also satire?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by FridgeSeal on Friday June 26, 2026 @02:13PM (#48689987)
Doesn’t look like anything to me.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by falcor84 on Friday June 26, 2026 @10:51PM (#48694670)
What? I'm genuinely asking what part of the incident response in the story the parent was referring to.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Incident CVE-2026-LGTM by oxzidized on Monday June 29, 2026 @12:29PM (#48721341)
I can't be positive, but I believe they were referring to Day 3?
[ Parent | on HN ]