News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time by dogscatstrees on Thursday June 25, 2026 @04:37PM (#48678886)
What is your origin story? How did you end up doing this and how can I do the same?
Re:A Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time by verditelabs on Thursday June 25, 2026 @04:39PM (#48678913)
BS in CS from a big state school in the USA. I have a hobby interest in history. I learned about the challenge on YouTube. Got involved contributing because I needed money. Then they put out a job posting. I applied, interviewed, and was hired.
Re:A Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time by Refreeze5224 on Thursday June 25, 2026 @04:43PM (#48678943)
What a cool job, and congrats on great work!
Re:A Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time by ghghgfdfgh on Thursday June 25, 2026 @09:25PM (#48681315)
I understand that the complexity of the project has increased over the years. How difficult is it for a newcomer to get into it?
Re:A Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time by verditelabs on Thursday June 25, 2026 @10:23PM (#48681640)
It has gotten harder, unfortunately. One of the barriers to entry is simply the massive amounts of data; not everyone can set aside $100s worth of HDD or SSD space to play around. That said I have done a lot of work to dramatically reduce the amount of storage and bandwidth needed.

We unfortunately get a lot of slop submissions, which is unfortunate. I think a _really_ good place to start is simply joining the discord and looking at the data we've published and trying to replicate something or anything really. We understand that not everyone is a researcher that can jump in making awesome immediately applicate submissions.

Granted, that's pretty specifically for people that want to submit for prizes and prize money. Everyone on the team absolutely loves to talk shop and interact with real people with real interest, so if you show it in the discord we are all more than happy to help, engage, fix bugs, gvmive advice, etc.

I would personally love to see more open source and contributed papyrology and translation, musing on difficult readings etc.

For the more technically inclined, testing software, pointing out bugs, and actually running and trying to fix things is a huge positive that we like. We get a lot of slop submissions that are just someone pasting an issue on our GitHub into codex or Claude. We don't want to encourage that. We can do that ourselves.