Re:GLM-5.2 is the step change for open agents
by selcuka on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:24PM
(#48667677)
Obviously this assumes that you can find 4+ extra hours of $50/hr work every month, or you can work 4 hours less. Neither of these assumptions is correct for people who work for a fixed salary.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GLM-5.2 is the step change for open agents
by devmor on Thursday June 25, 2026 @01:19AM
(#48669258)
That doesn’t change value. It’s value whether or not you can maintain a profit over it.
Re:GLM-5.2 is the step change for open agents
by selcuka on Thursday June 25, 2026 @09:04PM
(#48681191)
That's the definition of "value" in a broad, economics sense but I don't think it applies to the parent comment of this thread:
> I'm not sure how I'm supposed to get $200 of value out of personal use!
Re:GLM-5.2 is the step change for open agents
by devmor on Friday June 26, 2026 @02:59PM
(#48690553)
If you are not working paycheck to paycheck, but still need to commit that time to work, you may prefer $200 worth of free time that you otherwise could not have - that is my general point of view there.
Re:GLM-5.2 is the step change for open agents
by windexh8er on Thursday June 25, 2026 @09:11AM
(#48672804)
I think this is the rub the enterprise will be forced to grapple with. Not everyone is going to get $200 worth of value for the organization. In fact since it's not a restricted tool some will waste time and company resources using it. Undoubtedly some will get the value out of it, but it's very likely, that these are the same people providing more than what they're paid already. Nothing has changed other than, potentially, time savings and (hopefully) output improvement. Neither of those are any sort of guarantee though, either. Subjective systems are hard to show value, especially in the long term.