News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLMs Are Complicated Now by ffsm8 on Saturday June 20, 2026 @12:13PM (#48610359)
If you think statefull LLMs would be easier to handle then stateless... Then I think you haven't done a lot of software engineering
Re:LLMs Are Complicated Now by zsyllepsis on Saturday June 20, 2026 @01:13PM (#48610939)
Maybe a charitable reading of the parent comment, but my interpretation of it was that while the _models_ are stateless, modern deployments of these models for inference rely on state.

For example, tiered pricing for cached context relies on state, even if the models don’t.

Re:LLMs Are Complicated Now by zahlman on Saturday June 20, 2026 @01:18PM (#48610997)
For that matter, the agent harness accumulating "chat history" is state.
Re:LLMs Are Complicated Now by random3 on Saturday June 20, 2026 @01:17PM (#48610977)
This. lol. If you think state makes things easier you're in for a big surprise.
Re:LLMs Are Complicated Now by seanmcdirmid on Saturday June 20, 2026 @01:27PM (#48611080)
Of course you can pass in your own state, but I always wondered about an LLM that has conversation context stay resident in GPU memory somehow.

Or maybe this already effectively covered by context caching and the gains would be minimal (stateless, but if you pass in the same context or the same head context, it’s already in GPU memory and doesn’t need to be loaded?).