Re:Drone crashes mount at civilian airports
by barrkel on Saturday December 01, 2012 @07:28AM
(#4857462)
It's the combination that's problematic. It suggests that the killing is done lightly and carelessly, and it cheapens human lives.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Drone crashes mount at civilian airports
by mythealias on Saturday December 01, 2012 @07:51AM
(#4857506)
And yet that is the fact. The worth of human life is decided but what's in the pocket. The sooner you accept it the easier it will be.
Re:Drone crashes mount at civilian airports
by Roybatty on Saturday December 01, 2012 @12:56PM
(#4858388)
I should be surprised that a HN reader is falling for this guy's trick, but I guess I'm not.
"Oh and look at how the military is using these hacker kids with neck beards who part-time as assassins in between their Battlefield 3 matches"
I guess this guy (and apparently you too) would feel better if this guy was wearing a 3-piece suit before he launches a hellfire missile into a Taliban camp.
Re:Drone crashes mount at civilian airports
by barrkel on Saturday December 01, 2012 @08:52PM
(#4859774)
No, someone wearing a uniform and whose leash it tightly held by commissioned officer is a tiny bit more appropriate. A clear and unambiguous chain of command from the sovereign state is the least you can ask for in a war. Those involved should know that they are not autonomous agents, they are instruments of power, tools, and disposable themselves.