She took forever to make a decision about the fate of the PSG (personal systems groups,) Agonized months over what to do with (granted, a fatally wounded) WebOs. I'm not saying she wasn't dealt a tough hand. I couldn't agree more. Her predecessors strategic blunders were atrocious, but she could have acted with more urgency.
Meg Whitman "enshrined WebOS's abandonment", "After a long tortured process", "Agonized for months".
Steve Jobs on the other hand "Within months [...] slimmed down Apple's product portfolio to a handful of products".
Is it just me, or are you describing fundamentally the exact same actions? I sense a spin doctor in the house.
I really don't have an opinion on her, but it seems like the OP of this thread was using a not very sound argument to attempt to pillory the woman.