News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by meritt on Friday November 30, 2012 @03:08PM (#4855172)
Agreed.

When damn near every application today requires the user to click a link sent to their email, I can't envision any reason for actually validating the email at form submission time (except len <= 254). If they click the activation link, it's a legitimate user. End of story.

Re:Valid Email Addresses by bjt on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:20PM (#4855517)
If you're trying to optimize a registration process, you want to minimize the number of people you lose at each step. If someone gives you a bad email address, and then you try to send the activation link there, you've lost that registration. If you catch it when they submit the form then you've got a better shot at getting a complete registration from that user.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by fhars on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:31PM (#4855568)
But there are several businesses that tried to do exactly that and lost me as a customer since they didn't accept my perfectly valid address with a + in it.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by hamburglar on Friday November 30, 2012 @07:55PM (#4856354)
The key is that your validation is not about "accepting addresses you know are good" but "rejecting addresses you know are bad." If I enter foo@gmail@com as my email address, it's bad user experience to make me sit around refreshing my inbox and wondering where the confirmation email is.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by dbaupp on Friday November 30, 2012 @03:09PM (#4855175)
And inclusion of @.