News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by bwilliams on Friday November 30, 2012 @01:50PM (#4854749)
It's a bit extreme to correlate not being able to validate an email address (that isn't in a common format) to having other loose ends.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by jacquesm on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:00PM (#4854809)
My email address is in a very common format.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by kbolino on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:19PM (#4854941)
Please be mindful that you responded to a post citing the example of

  ""()<>[]:,;@\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~ ? ^_`{}|~.a"@example.org"
That address is not "common" even if it is technically valid. If you want to talk about your own email address, you should provide a sample address that is similar so we know what you're talking about.

[edit: I see your address in your profile. It is nothing like the example given.]

Re:Valid Email Addresses by simcop2387 on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:31PM (#4854997)
If it's the one that you have on some of your social media sites, nice. I can suspect why they reject it but is it primarily because of the short length?
Re:Valid Email Addresses by jacquesm on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:39PM (#4855603)
At a guess the problem is probably a code snippet that checks for minimum length. You could have an even shorter one for a single letter domain in a two letter tld, for instance [email protected]