Re:Copper transport drug restores memory and clears toxic Al...
by cassepipe on Monday June 15, 2026 @01:17PM
(#48544310)
I believe you don't have read the link I posted because its author does address the narrative you present here
But again I am not saying you are wrong and I am even sympathetic to this narrative but ultimately, unconvinced, either way
Re:Copper transport drug restores memory and clears toxic Al...
by uxhacker on Monday June 15, 2026 @01:35PM
(#48544537)
Groupthink is very much the scientific method. According to Imre Lakatos the key question is does the group expand knowledge or contract it (very rushed reply as about to catch a flight)
Re:Copper transport drug restores memory and clears toxic Al...
by biomcgary on Monday June 15, 2026 @01:59PM
(#48544856)
In Lakatosian terms, the amyloid hypothesis is an example of a degenerating research program that has largely failed to predict new observations and is primarily driven by post hoc reasoning. The hypothesis was rescued by research claiming a significant new observation that was ultimately shown to be fraudulent (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12397490/).
From a Lakatosian perspective, the amyloid hypothesis is not necessarily wrong, but it is not paying off in terms of empirical insights relative to the amount of attention and funding it has received.
Re:Copper transport drug restores memory and clears toxic Al...
by jjtheblunt on Monday June 15, 2026 @01:48PM
(#48544730)
Proofs and Refutations is a great book
Re:Copper transport drug restores memory and clears toxic Al...
by a_conservative on Monday June 15, 2026 @01:24PM
(#48544407)
An example of fraud in research that contributed to the consensus.
> The 2006 paper suggested an amyloid beta (Aβ) protein called Aβ*56 could cause Alzheimer’s.
https://www.science.org/content/article/researchers-plan-ret...
To be clear this isn’t about whether it’s right or wrong it’s about that science involves investigating all avenues with evidence, proof, and rigor. Group think is how we end up incorporating bias into science, which is anti scientific.