Yes, the burden should not lie on the author, and you could argue it's not even relevant. Still, the default has shifted and there's a refreshing feeling when you're forced to choose your own words.
This is not perfect. You can still find ways to have a machine write a text into this box. But what's guaranteed is the time: writing a message takes the time a human would actually need.
At the very least writtenhuman.com is a statement that the problem it's tackling is real. One with the potential to become a global crisis.
(plausibility 100/100 · mean 58 wpm · peak 108 wpm · cadence 4.5 keys/s · duration 2:56)</copy>
Not verified human
Thanks for checking it out :)
Sadly, this will always be a game of cat and mouse. I wonder if it was ever avoidable for the internet to become a hundred of such games at once, between advertisers and ad blockers, trackers and browsers, hackers and developers, search engines and SEO experts...
If your concept took off, someone will make a program that inputs the LLMs text like a human would. It might still take some time (if it isn't possible to hack the timing records client-side), you'd probably have to get busy detecting multiple connections from the same IP, and then they'd work around it...
Yes, the burden should not lie on the author, and you could argue it's not even relevant. Still, the default has shifted and there's a refreshing feeling when you're forced to choose your own words.
This is not perfect. You can still find ways to have a machine write a text into this box. But what's guaranteed is the time: writing a message takes the time a human would actually need.
At the very least writtenhuman.com is a statement that the problem it's tackling is real. One with the potential to become a global crisis.
(plausibility 100/100 · mean 58 wpm · peak 108 wpm · cadence 4.5 keys/s · duration 2:56)
Verified human · www.writtenhuman.com/v/m7h8asjd