Did Anthropic ask for this?

Re:Did Anthropic ask for this? by mitthrowaway2 on Sunday June 14, 2026 @07:00PM (#48533909)

I posted this comment on the other thread, but it deserves mention here too, because Anthropic also asked for this ~10 days ago, separately from the post linked in the article.

https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improveme...

> We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology.

In their subsequent post this week responding to the announcement of the export ban, Anthropic wrote:

> If this standard was applied across the industry, we believe it would essentially halt all new model deployments for all frontier model providers.

Which is what they said would be good.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Anthropic ask for this? by reasonableklout on Sunday June 14, 2026 @07:51PM (#48534448)

Great, so let's have the government apply the standard across the industry and see whether Anthropic sticks to their stated beliefs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Anthropic ask for this? by cdestroyer on Sunday June 14, 2026 @08:05PM (#48534608)

the link appears to be broken. Only shows a 404 poem :(

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Anthropic ask for this? by fwipsy on Sunday June 14, 2026 @08:45PM (#48535040)

It's missing a "nt:" https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improveme...

[ Parent | on HN ]