News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Codex for Open Source by tclancy on Saturday June 13, 2026 @09:10PM (#48523200)
Where am I going to find [email protected]?
Re:Codex for Open Source by manquer on Saturday June 13, 2026 @09:52PM (#48523415)
Using a plus sign is subaddressing [1] and most ESPs[2] will route to the main address ( [email protected]) . So you can use use [email protected], [email protected] and both will route the email to you.

In my experience most SaaS apps do not filter this out and allow re-sign ups with sub-addresses.

Gmail has an additional behavior that dot character is ignored in local component of the address . [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] all route to the same inbox as well.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5233 [2] Less common in work hosted ESPs but almost universally default enabled in public ESPs for consumers.

Re:Codex for Open Source by dhshhshsj on Sunday June 14, 2026 @02:19AM (#48524668)
This is not true (anymore?). I have a rather unfortunate exact naming collision with a family member. They use the full name without dot for the local gmail component, I use a dot between the first and last name.

Two or three mails have been misplaced in a decade.

Re:Codex for Open Source by manquer on Sunday June 14, 2026 @02:30AM (#48524716)
It is still the rules for Gmail (https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7436150?hl=en).

It would be feasible to change something like that without breaking security now.

Google can hardly start allowing/routing a new account for [email protected] when you were getting it for years even though your account is [email protected] and sensitive communication like say from your bank would routed there.

Re:Codex for Open Source by maybe_pablo on Saturday June 13, 2026 @11:32PM (#48523927)
icloud+ hide my email for $0.99
Re:Codex for Open Source by Groxx on Saturday June 13, 2026 @09:13PM (#48523216)
One can consult the oracle, /dev/random