AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42

Re:AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42 by lionkor on Friday June 12, 2026 @03:52AM (#48501137)

> straight up malicious

Yes, against an AI agent. The super intelligent, "soon AGI" agent could have figured out that it's being messed with, but of course it didn't.

I would blame the AI companies for marketing this, not the technically well versed people for realizing that the operator of this AI does not care at all and can't be bothered to do the absolute basics.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42 by helsinkiandrew on Friday June 12, 2026 @04:17AM (#48501338)

I'm not sure why people assume the coming AGI super agents will be infallible.

There's no sign that highly intelligent people can't be conned - Bernie Maddoff fooled leading scientists and CEOs working in finance. Software engineers and lawyers fall for pig butchering schemes and spoofed emails with altered bank details every week - so why would an AGI trained from human content be any different.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42 by lionkor on Friday June 12, 2026 @04:20AM (#48501361)

$1T valuation AI better be infallible.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42 by mey on Friday June 12, 2026 @01:52PM (#48507272)

Narrator: The AI was not infact infallible.

[ Parent | on HN ]