Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by solenoid0937 on Thursday June 11, 2026 @06:41PM
(#48497401)
This is like the most milquetoast stance in the AI safety community. It's great the Trump admin did something, no one expected them to, and they should have done more. Very powerful tools released to the public should be regulated for safety.
That is "pretty reasonable" to most people (except the tech-libertarian crowd).
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by CamperBob2 on Friday June 12, 2026 @12:32AM
(#48499954)
Fine, call me a tech-libertarian. I don't think Donald Trump should be involved in regulating AI.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by solenoid0937 on Friday June 12, 2026 @07:59AM
(#48503008)
Even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day. This was an objectively good thing.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by trollbridge on Friday June 12, 2026 @09:08AM
(#48503666)
So, will the Chinese models agree to let the U.S. government also vet them first before release?
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by CamperBob2 on Friday June 12, 2026 @11:45AM
(#48505605)
He hasn't thought it through that far, or thought about what it will take to enforce his "pretty reasonable statement."
Or maybe he has. I don't know.
But I tend to agree, just saying it's a "pretty reasonable statement" and leaving it at that is beyond the pale for anyone who doesn't have an undisclosed stake in the argument.